Why Bell’s inequality is wrong?

WU Xinzhong

WU Xinzhong Shanghai Jiaotong University

Keywords: EPR argument, Bell's Inequality, Quantum Gravity.

Abstract

This paper examines the history from EPR argument to Bell’s inequality and the influence of Bell’s inequality on the frontier exploration of quantum mechanics. It is found that Bell’s inequality has some hidden assumptions different from EPR argument: Following Schrodinger's assumption that the measurement process of EPR experiment undergos time, Karl Hess regards time as an implicit variable of time series, and Joy Christian obtains a local implicit variable inequality different from Bell's inequality. They extended the relativistic space-time geometric analysis method to the localized geometric morphological analysis of quantum states, and considered that the Bell’s inequality reasoning did not meet the requirements of the completeness of EPR argument. Quantum statistics given by identical particles is different from classical statistics. Innovative ensemble interpretation can also solve Bell's inequality and give a demonstration of quantum non-locality. The main research progress of quantum gravity is great, but there are many divergences. According to Einstein's local realism, the new explanation and expression of quantum mechanics may open up new ideas for the study of quantum gravity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. A.Einstein,B.Podolsky,N.Rosen.Can Quantum Mechanics description of physical reality be considered complete?Phys.Rev.47,777(1935).
2. Max Jammer, Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Chinese version translated by Qin Kecheng, Business Press, p270-302 (2014).
3. Zhang Yongde, Roots of quantum wisdom, Tsinghua University Press, p255-265(2012).
4. Roger Penrose, Emperor's New Brain.Chinese version translated by Xu Mingxian and Wu Zhongchao. Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House, p331(1994).
5. Quantum concepts in space and time, Edited by R.Penrose and C.J.Ishanm, Oxford University Press, p293-301(1986).
6. Scully.M.O.,Ahanorov.Y. and Englert,B.G.(1999) On the locality and Reality of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations. In: Bonifacio, R.,ED.,AIP,Mysteries, Puzzles and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechnics. p47-67.
7. Murray Gell-Mann, Quark and Puma, Chinese version translated by Yang Jianye and Li Xianglian, Hunan Science and Technology Press, p171(1997).
8. Karl Hess, Einstein was right! Pan Stanford Publishing Pte.Ltd, p43-52(2015).
9. Karl Hess.Bell’s theorem and instantaneous influences at a distance. Journal of Modern Physics,9,1573-1590(2018).
10. De Raedt, H.A.Michielson,Karl Hess. The Photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments:Computer models with single-wing selection, Open Physics, 15, 713-733(2017). http://doi.org/10.1515/physics-2017-0085.
11. Joy Christian. Disproof of Bell’s theorem,Brown Walker Press, Second edition, p84-92(2014).
12. Mei Xiaochun, Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Configuration Space Full Identity Multi-particles Ensemble,p7-59, http://www.mxcphy.cn/pdf/qm/qm2/pdf.
13.Xiaochun Mei,Ping Yu, The Definition of Universal Momentum Operator of Quantum Mechanicsand the Essence of Micro-Particle’s Spin，Journal of Modern Physics, 2012, No.6, p.451- 470. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp/.
14. Kip S. Thorne, Black Hole and Time Curve, Chinese version translated by Li Yong, Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House, , p213(2000).
15.Albert Einstein, Approximate Integration of the Field Equation of Gravitation, Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akadamie der Wissenchaften, Berlin, p688-696 (1916).
16.W.Heisenberg and W.Pauli, Zur Quantemdynamik der Wellenfelder, Zeit.für Physik, 56:1-61,p3(1929).
17. Shao Liang, Shao Dan, Shao Changgui: Quantum Theory of Space and Time, Science Press, p344-348(2011).
18. Lee Smolin,The trouble with physics, Chinese version translated by Li Yong, Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House,p314,p227(2008).